User contributions
From Telecommunications & Wireless Companies
(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 20:59, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern')
- 20:57, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern')
- 20:52, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is)
- 20:32, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
- 20:17, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:)
- 20:16, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is)
- 20:10, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar)
- 20:01, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
- 19:50, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)
- 19:35, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://erinmariehogannude.typepad.com ERIN MARIE HOGAN N)
- 19:33, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
- 19:28, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in)
- 19:19, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and)
- 19:08, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is)
- 18:53, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo)
- 18:51, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in)
- 18:46, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create)
- 18:38, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i)
- 18:27, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (I always wondered if the Manchurian Candidate � McLame � would make an appearance. I think he is a victim of Stockholm Syndrome, too., http://sameerareddynude2.typepad.com SAMEERA REDDY NUDE, 92914,)
- 18:11, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (I like the idea of a private blog if getting the RSS and reading posts was as simple as public. If there are too many hoops just to get notice of and read a single post it will get frustrating., http:)
- 18:10, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?, http://soleilmoonfryenude2.typepad.com SOLEIL MO)
- 17:55, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s., http://vanessahudgensnackt5.typepad.com VANESSA HUDGENS NA)
- 17:44, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is)
- 17:29, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://kathyirelandnude3.typepad.com KATHY IRELAND NUDE SEX TAPE,)
- 17:27, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern')
- 17:22, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom)
- 17:03, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
- 16:48, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://krisjennernude2.typep)
- 16:46, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the fie)
- 16:41, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is)
- 16:34, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
- 16:21, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)
- 16:05, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar)
- 16:04, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange)
- 15:58, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://melaniegriffithnude2.)
- 15:50, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
- 15:38, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://heidiklumobenohne3.typepad.com HEIDI KLUM OBEN OH)
- 15:22, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in)
- 15:21, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
- 15:15, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in)
- 15:07, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast)
- 14:56, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t)
- 14:40, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://rebeccaromijnnaked1.typepad.com REBECCA ROMIJN NA)
- 14:38, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's appar)
- 14:33, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create)
- 14:24, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney)
- 14:13, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as)
- 13:57, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) Talk:Main Page (Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i)
- 13:55, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:87.118.92.72 (It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange)
- 13:50, 18 May 2012 (hist) (diff) User talk:62.215.5.69 (I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesom)
(Newest | Oldest) View (Newer 50) (Older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
